AI News/Wire summary

AI refusals are unreliable, opaque and costly, the article argues

Key points

  • Companies train models to refuse prompts, using other AI models to run exercises that reward refusals and penalize over-refusal.
  • Anthropic reportedly said one type of classifier added 24% to its chatbots' compute costs earlier this year.
  • Refusals are probabilistic: repeated identical risky questions were generally refused, but every so often a model answered, per Ryan McBain's tests.
  • AI companies currently decide where the refusal line falls, and they reportedly do so with utmost secrecy.

Why it matters for marketers: Content teams should expect inconsistent refusals on borderline topics and should not assume a tool's safety filters are fixed or fully predictable.

Summary by the Z Media news desk, from the outlets' reporting. Read the full stories at the source.

Read the original

MIT Technology Review: We’re putting too much faith in AI’s ability to say no

Related on Z Media